Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the French existentialist philosopher , writer playwright and essayist . One ofthe main points of his philosophy is the concept of prerogative . He considered that s carcely somebody determines his future by recognize decisions , therefore he is condemned to be free . I gibe with Sartre that the single(a) is completely responsible for all his choices however , in my opinion , absolute emancipation undersurface exist wholly in theory whereas in real life the individual limits his or her license , in to correspond to some classic , public etc . rules , because the benignant universe depends on temper and the societyTo scrawl with , Sartre didn t take into the account the fact that an individual has to depend on nature , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the pityingity organism has conquered nature . For example , he has changed the channel of the river , sunk mountains and as yet made nuclear energy to work for his realise . therefrom , there emerges the impression that he is free to do what he wants and nonhing in this world shadower moderate him as yet , it is a matter of common knowledge that human activities in the recent years have so greatly contaminate nature that we are facing the problem of planetary warm up . This is a serious hazard nowadays and m any(prenominal) an(prenominal) scientists deal with this problem . We lot t live contrary to laws of nature and have to be responsible for our activities . thence , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I part agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , simply our liberty is limited , as we depend on nature and can t do whatever we likeIn my opinion , freedom of the individual depe nds on many factors specifically on the soci! ety , in which he or she lives . This standpoint can be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his understanding(a) of freedom .

The individual who is standing at a cliff and has a right to move come on or not . Nobody and nothing can go along him from the fatal step , and it is here that the freedom of the human being becomes apparent . However , on mature verbal prospect , many considerations make the individual stick to life and not to death , for instance , the sufferings of relatives , the lot of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the responsibility for his or her death go away be born by their relatives or tight fitting friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close people and the society on the unhurt . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor responsibility can be absoluteFurthermore , ad hominem freedom can t be absolute , because one personalised freedom ends where another personal freedom starts . For instance , when go in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to write down a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay